At the Global Leadership Summit last week one of the speakers, Craig Groeschel, made a statement that got me thinking.
This is such an important reality, a vivid distinction, a paradigm shift that makes the way we view ourselves, our churches and our lives differently than if we were to live as if we ourselves were the central focus of all we do and say.
Is this statement something the Bible supports? The Bible tells us that the church is the bride of Christ, we belong to God, but in this world whose are we?
Of course if we traversed the entirety of the scriptures on this one we would find a lot of theological truths to dissect but let’s stick to two (well sort of three) key analogies from Jesus himself that address the issue.
1.A city on a hill and the light of the world; and
2.Salt
A city on a hill and light of the world.
Salt.
Salt and light … these analogies tell us that the church is for the darkness and for that which would decay without it.
What this means, for me, what I see as the implication is that the church exists not for the church but for those outside of it.
The question becomes do our lives and of our churches reflect the truth that we are meant for the world?
Occasionally yes, occasionally no. We get it right sometimes, but what I see in so many churches I know is that most money, most programs, most thought, most sermons, most everything is geared toward the people of the church.
That’s not to say we don’t need the church to meet the needs of Christians.
We exist for the world. To bring the hope of Christ.
What we are meant for should inform how we allocate all of the gifts God has given us as a body.
Comments